UNATEGO MIDDLE SCHOOL DATA

2016-17

2015-16

Archive

STUDENT DATA

Enrollment Data

3-8 ELA Assessment Data

3-8 Math Assessment Data

SCHOOL DATA

School Report Card

EDUCATOR DATA

Annual Professional Performance Review Ratings - Education Law §3012-c

State-Provided Growth Ratings

STUDENT DATA

Enrollment Data

3-8 ELA Assessment Data

3-8 Math Assessment Data

English Language Learners Data

SCHOOL DATA

School Report Card

Please wait while we create your PDF.

Save as PDF

MY COMPARISONS

You currently have nothing selected for comparison. Click the + icon below to add this school for comparison.

How do comparisons work?

QUICK COMPARISONS

COMPARE WITH LAST YEAR

COMPARE WITH OTEGO-UNADILLA CSD

COMPARE WITH OTSEGO COUNTY

COMPARE WITH NY STATE

COUNTIES

BOCES

DISTRICTS

SCHOOLS

HIGHER EDUCATION

DOWNLOADS

COUNTIES

BOCES

DISTRICTS

SCHOOLS

HIGHER EDUCATION

DOWNLOADS

New York State

OTSEGO COUNTY

OTEGO-UNADILLA CSD

UNATEGO MIDDLE SCHOOL

UNATEGO MIDDLE SCHOOL - School Report Card Data [2016 - 17]

The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students.
Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules

What data would you like to see?

Profile Data

Enrollment

Average Class Size

Free and Reduced-Price Lunch

Attendance

Student Suspensions

Teacher Qualifications

Staff Counts

Assessment Data

Grades 3-8 English Language Arts

Grades 3-8 Mathematics

Grades 4 & 8 Science

Regents Exams

New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test

Accountability Data

Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts

Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics

Elementary/Middle-Level Science

Unweighted Combined PIs

UNATEGO MIDDLE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT (2016 - 17)

K-12 ENROLLMENT

190

ENROLLMENT BY GENDER

MALE

91

48%

FEMALE

99

52%

ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY

GROUP

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

HISPANIC OR LATINO

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

TOTAL

4

8

2

170

6

PERCENT

2%

4%

1%

89%

3%

OTHER GROUPS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

—

—

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

32

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

116

61%

ENROLLMENT BY GRADE

GROUP

6TH GRADE

7TH GRADE

8TH GRADE

TOTAL

58

64

68

PERCENT

31%

34%

36%

UNATEGO MIDDLE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT (2016 - 17)

K-12 Enrollment: 190

ENROLLMENT BY GENDER

MALE

91

48%

FEMALE

99

52%

ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

8

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

2

1%

WHITE

170

89%

MULTIRACIAL

6

3%

OTHER GROUPS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

—

—

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

32

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

116

61%

ENROLLMENT BY GRADE

6TH GRADE

58

31%

7TH GRADE

64

34%

8TH GRADE

68

36%

Average Class Size (2016 - 17)

GROUP

Grade 8 Mathematics

Grade 8 Science

Grade 8 Social Studies

CLASS SIZE

14

16

17

Average Class Size (2016 - 17)

Grade 8 Mathematics

14

Grade 8 Science

16

Grade 8 Social Studies

17

Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2016 - 17)

ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH

86

45%

ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH

24

13%

Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2016 - 17)

Eligible for Free Lunch

86

45%

Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch

24

13%

ATTENDANCE (2015 - 16)

ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE

92%

Attendance (2015 - 16)

Annual Attendance Rate

92%

STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (2015 - 16)

14

7%

Student Suspensions (2015 - 16)

Student Suspensions

14

7%

Staff Counts (2016 - 17)

GROUP

PRINCIPALS

ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS

OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF

PARAPROFESSIONALS

STAFF

1

0

0

0

Staff Counts (2016 - 17)

Principals

1

Assistant Principals

0

Other Professional Staff

0

Paraprofessionals

0

Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)

TOTAL TEACHERS

14

PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE

0%

PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE

0%

PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

7%

PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE

0%

Total Number of Classes

74

Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification

1%

Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)

TOTAL TEACHERS: 14

Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate

0%

Percent Teaching Out of Certification

0%

Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience

7%

Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate

0%

Total Number of Classes

74

Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification

1%

Grade 6 English Language Arts

MEAN SCORE: 305

All Students

PROFICIENT

31%

TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

19

53%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 4

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

33%

TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

15

50%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

17%

TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

53%

TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

Male

PROFICIENT

14%

TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

13

62%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

31%

TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

19

53%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

23%

TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

13

59%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

43%

TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

31%

TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

19

53%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

36

32

4

1

3

30

2

6

15

21

36

22

14

36

PROFICIENT

31%

_%

_%

_%

_%

33%

_%

17%

53%

14%

31%

23%

43%

31%

LEVEL 1

6

17%

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

5

17%

_

_

1

17%

1

7%

5

24%

6

17%

4

18%

2

14%

6

17%

LEVEL 2

19

53%

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

15

50%

_

_

4

67%

6

40%

13

62%

19

53%

13

59%

6

43%

19

53%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

5

17%

_

_

1

17%

4

27%

2

10%

6

17%

3

14%

3

21%

6

17%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

5

17%

_

_

0

0%

4

27%

1

5%

5

14%

2

9%

3

21%

5

14%

Grade 7 English Language Arts

MEAN SCORE: 306

All Students

PROFICIENT

36%

TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

19

42%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

General Education

PROFICIENT

40%

TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

17

43%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

0%

TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

35%

TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

18

45%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

40%

TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

25%

TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Male

PROFICIENT

48%

TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

10

48%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

29%

TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

47%

TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

36%

TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

19

42%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Hispanic or Latino

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

45

40

5

1

1

40

3

5

24

21

44

1

28

17

45

PROFICIENT

36%

40%

0%

_%

_%

35%

_%

40%

25%

48%

_%

_%

29%

47%

36%

LEVEL 1

10

22%

7

18%

3

60%

_

_

_

_

8

20%

_

_

2

40%

7

29%

3

14%

_

_

_

_

8

29%

2

12%

10

22%

LEVEL 2

19

42%

17

43%

2

40%

_

_

_

_

18

45%

_

_

1

20%

11

46%

8

38%

_

_

_

_

12

43%

7

41%

19

42%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

15

38%

0

0%

_

_

_

_

13

33%

_

_

2

40%

5

21%

10

48%

_

_

_

_

8

29%

7

41%

15

33%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

1

3%

0

0%

_

_

_

_

1

3%

_

_

0

0%

1

4%

0

0%

_

_

_

_

0

0%

1

6%

1

2%

Grade 8 English Language Arts

MEAN SCORE: 309

All Students

PROFICIENT

38%

TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

22

56%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 4

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

41%

TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

20

59%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

20%

TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

38%

TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

12

57%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

Male

PROFICIENT

39%

TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

10

56%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

38%

TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

22

56%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

50%

TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

9

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

29%

TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

15

71%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

38%

TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

22

56%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

39

35

4

1

1

34

3

5

21

18

39

18

21

39

PROFICIENT

38%

_%

_%

_%

_%

41%

_%

20%

38%

39%

38%

50%

29%

38%

LEVEL 1

2

5%

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

0

0%

_

_

2

40%

1

5%

1

6%

2

5%

2

11%

0

0%

2

5%

LEVEL 2

22

56%

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

20

59%

_

_

2

40%

12

57%

10

56%

22

56%

7

39%

15

71%

22

56%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

12

35%

_

_

1

20%

6

29%

7

39%

13

33%

9

50%

4

19%

13

33%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

2

6%

_

_

0

0%

2

10%

0

0%

2

5%

0

0%

2

10%

2

5%

Grade 6 Mathematics

MEAN SCORE: 297

All Students

PROFICIENT

21%

TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

16

55%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

21%

TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

16

55%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Female

PROFICIENT

18%

TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

Male

PROFICIENT

22%

TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

10

56%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

21%

TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

16

55%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

25%

TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

11

69%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

15%

TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

21%

TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

16

55%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

29

26

3

1

1

25

2

29

11

18

29

16

13

29

PROFICIENT

21%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

21%

18%

22%

21%

25%

15%

21%

LEVEL 1

7

24%

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

7

24%

3

27%

4

22%

7

24%

1

6%

6

46%

7

24%

LEVEL 2

16

55%

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

16

55%

6

55%

10

56%

16

55%

11

69%

5

38%

16

55%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

5

17%

1

9%

4

22%

5

17%

3

19%

2

15%

5

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

1

3%

1

9%

0

0%

1

3%

1

6%

0

0%

1

3%

Grade 7 Mathematics

Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.

MEAN SCORE: 310

All Students

PROFICIENT

38%

TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

11

23%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

General Education

PROFICIENT

44%

TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

18

44%

LEVEL 3

13

32%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

0%

TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

6

100%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

38%

TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

9

21%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

40%

TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

23%

TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

13

50%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Male

PROFICIENT

57%

TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

38%

TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

39%

TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

38%

TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

11

23%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Hispanic or Latino

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

47

41

6

1

1

42

3

5

26

21

46

1

29

18

47

PROFICIENT

38%

44%

0%

_%

_%

38%

_%

40%

23%

57%

_%

_%

38%

39%

38%

LEVEL 1

11

23%

5

12%

6

100%

_

_

_

_

9

21%

_

_

2

40%

7

27%

4

19%

_

_

_

_

9

31%

2

11%

11

23%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

18

44%

0

0%

_

_

_

_

17

40%

_

_

1

20%

13

50%

5

24%

_

_

_

_

9

31%

9

50%

18

38%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

13

32%

0

0%

_

_

_

_

11

26%

_

_

2

40%

5

19%

8

38%

_

_

_

_

7

24%

6

33%

13

28%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

5

12%

0

0%

_

_

_

_

5

12%

_

_

0

0%

1

4%

4

19%

_

_

_

_

4

14%

1

6%

5

11%

Grade 8 Mathematics

Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.

MEAN SCORE: 295

All Students

PROFICIENT

9%

TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

9

28%

LEVEL 2

20

63%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

General Education

PROFICIENT

11%

TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

19

70%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

0%

TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

8%

TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

6

23%

LEVEL 2

18

69%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

17%

TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

6%

TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

10

63%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Male

PROFICIENT

13%

TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

10

63%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

9%

TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

9

28%

LEVEL 2

20

63%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

7%

TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

12%

TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

12

71%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

9%

TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

9

28%

LEVEL 2

20

63%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

32

27

5

1

1

1

26

3

6

16

16

32

15

17

32

PROFICIENT

9%

11%

0%

_%

_%

_%

8%

_%

17%

6%

13%

9%

7%

12%

9%

LEVEL 1

9

28%

5

19%

4

80%

_

_

_

_

_

_

6

23%

_

_

3

50%

5

31%

4

25%

9

28%

6

40%

3

18%

9

28%

LEVEL 2

20

63%

19

70%

1

20%

_

_

_

_

_

_

18

69%

_

_

2

33%

10

63%

10

63%

20

63%

8

53%

12

71%

20

63%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

3

11%

0

0%

_

_

_

_

_

_

2

8%

_

_

1

17%

1

6%

2

13%

3

9%

1

7%

2

12%

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

_

_

_

_

_

_

0

0%

_

_

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test

Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE

9

100%

LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE

9

100%

GROUP

All Students

TOTAL TESTED

9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

4 & ABOVE

9

100%

3 & ABOVE

9

100%

Grade 8 Science

Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.

MEAN SCORE: 76

All Students

PROFICIENT

81%

TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

30

51%

LEVEL 4

18

31%

General Education

PROFICIENT

88%

TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

28

54%

LEVEL 4

18

35%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

29%

TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

87%

TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

29

56%

LEVEL 4

16

31%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

43%

TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

Female

PROFICIENT

79%

TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

15

52%

LEVEL 4

8

28%

Male

PROFICIENT

83%

TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

15

50%

LEVEL 4

10

33%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

81%

TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

30

51%

LEVEL 4

18

31%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

69%

TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

12

38%

LEVEL 4

10

31%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

96%

TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

18

67%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

81%

TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

30

51%

LEVEL 4

18

31%

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

59

52

7

1

1

2

52

3

7

29

30

59

32

27

59

PROFICIENT

81%

88%

29%

_%

_%

_%

87%

_%

43%

79%

83%

81%

69%

96%

81%

LEVEL 1

1

2%

0

0%

1

14%

_

_

_

_

_

_

1

2%

_

_

0

0%

0

0%

1

3%

1

2%

1

3%

0

0%

1

2%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

6

12%

4

57%

_

_

_

_

_

_

6

12%

_

_

4

57%

6

21%

4

13%

10

17%

9

28%

1

4%

10

17%

LEVEL 3

30

51%

28

54%

2

29%

_

_

_

_

_

_

29

56%

_

_

1

14%

15

52%

15

50%

30

51%

12

38%

18

67%

30

51%

LEVEL 4

18

31%

18

35%

0

0%

_

_

_

_

_

_

16

31%

_

_

2

29%

8

28%

10

33%

18

31%

10

31%

8

30%

18

31%

Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test

Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.

All Students

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

GROUP

All Students

TOTAL TESTED

1

PROFICIENT

_%

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Regents Examination Results (2016 - 17)

Algebra I (Common Core)

Algebra I (Common Core)

GROUP

All Students

General Education

White

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

9

9

9

6

3

9

4

5

9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

_

_

_

_

0

0%

_

_

_

_

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

_

_

_

_

0

0%

_

_

_

_

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

_

_

_

_

0

0%

_

_

_

_

0

0%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

5

56%

5

56%

_

_

_

_

5

56%

_

_

_

_

5

56%

LEVEL 5

4

44%

4

44%

4

44%

_

_

_

_

4

44%

_

_

_

_

4

44%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 9

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

LEVEL 5

4

44%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 9

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

LEVEL 5

4

44%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 9

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

LEVEL 5

4

44%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 6

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 3

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 9

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

LEVEL 5

4

44%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 4

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 5

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 9

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

LEVEL 5

4

44%

Living Environment

Regents Living Environment

GROUP

All Students

General Education

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

18

18

17

1

18

12

6

18

6

12

18

55

18

100%

18

100%

_

_

_

_

18

100%

12

100%

6

100%

18

100%

6

100%

12

100%

18

100%

65

18

100%

18

100%

_

_

_

_

18

100%

12

100%

6

100%

18

100%

6

100%

12

100%

18

100%

85

13

72%

13

72%

_

_

_

_

13

72%

8

67%

5

83%

13

72%

4

67%

9

75%

13

72%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 18

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

18

100%

65

18

100%

85

13

72%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 18

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

18

100%

65

18

100%

85

13

72%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 17

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Multiracial

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 18

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

18

100%

65

18

100%

85

13

72%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 12

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

12

100%

65

12

100%

85

8

67%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 6

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

6

100%

65

6

100%

85

5

83%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 18

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

18

100%

65

18

100%

85

13

72%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 6

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

6

100%

65

6

100%

85

4

67%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 12

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

12

100%

65

12

100%

85

9

75%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 18

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

18

100%

65

18

100%

85

13

72%

New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2016 - 17)

Grade 7

GROUP

All Students

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED

1

1

ENTERING

_

_

EMERGING

_

_

TRANSITIONING

_

_

EXPANDING

_

_

COMMANDING

_

_

Grade 8

GROUP

All Students

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED

1

1

ENTERING

_

_

EMERGING

_

_

TRANSITIONING

_

_

EXPANDING

_

_

COMMANDING

_

_

Grade 7

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 1

ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 1

ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

Grade 8

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 1

ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 1

ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP

All Students

American Indian or Alaska Native

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

White

Multiracial

Students With Disabilities

Limited English Proficient

Economically Disadvantaged

MADE AYP

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

―

―

NO

Tested 95%

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

―

―

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

380*

0

4

8

2

336*

8

30

2

230*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

67%*

―

―

―

―

66%*

―

―

―

62%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

118

0

2

5

1

104

6

13

1

66

PI

119

―

―

―

―

124

―

―

―

109

EAMO

101

―

―

―

―

114

―

―

―

90

Safe Harbor Target

101

―

―

―

―

114

―

―

―

90

All Students

MADE AYP: NO

Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

380*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

67%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

118

PI

119

EAMO

101

Safe Harbor Target

101

American Indian or Alaska Native

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Black or African American

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

4

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

2

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Hispanic or Latino

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

8

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

5

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

2

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

1

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

White

MADE AYP: NO

Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

336*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

66%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

104

PI

124

EAMO

114

Safe Harbor Target

114

Multiracial

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

8

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

6

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Students With Disabilities

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

30

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

13

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Limited English Proficient

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

2

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

1

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Economically Disadvantaged

MADE AYP: NO

Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

230*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

62%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

66

PI

109

EAMO

90

Safe Harbor Target

90

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP

Not American Indian or Alaska Native

Not Black or African American

Not Hispanic or Latino

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Not White

Not Multiracial

General Education

English Proficient

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Male

Female

Migrant

Not Migrant

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

380*

374*

362*

374*

22

366*

317*

376*

150*

180*

200*

0

380*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

67%*

67%*

66%*

67%*

―

66%*

70%*

66%*

73%*

70%*

64%*

―

67%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

118

116

113

117

14

112

105

117

52

58

60

0

118

PI

119

121

120

120

―

119

128

120

131

116

122

―

119

Not American Indian or Alaska Native

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

380*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

67%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

118

PI

119

Not Black or African American

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

374*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

67%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

116

PI

121

Not Hispanic or Latino

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

362*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

66%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

113

PI

120

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

374*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

67%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

117

PI

120

Not White

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

22

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

14

PI

―

Not Multiracial

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

366*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

66%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

112

PI

119

General Education

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

317*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

70%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

105

PI

128

English Proficient

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

376*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

66%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

117

PI

120

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

150*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

73%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

52

PI

131

Male

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

180*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

70%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

58

PI

116

Female

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

200*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

64%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

60

PI

122

Migrant

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

―

Not Migrant

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

380*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

67%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

118

PI

119

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.

Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP

All Students

American Indian or Alaska Native

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

White

Multiracial

Students With Disabilities

Limited English Proficient

Economically Disadvantaged

MADE AYP

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

―

―

NO

Tested 95%

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

―

―

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

381*

0

4

8

2

337*

8

31

2

231*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

60%*

―

―

―

―

60%*

―

―

―

54%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

115

0

2

3

2

102

6

14

1

62

PI

107

―

―

―

―

112

―

―

―

105

EAMO

99

―

―

―

―

111

―

―

―

88

Safe Harbor Target

99

―

―

―

―

111

―

―

―

88

All Students

MADE AYP: NO

Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

381*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

60%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

115

PI

107

EAMO

99

Safe Harbor Target

99

American Indian or Alaska Native

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Black or African American

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

4

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

2

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Hispanic or Latino

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

8

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

3

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

2

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

2

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

White

MADE AYP: NO

Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

337*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

60%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

102

PI

112

EAMO

111

Safe Harbor Target

111

Multiracial

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

8

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

6

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Students With Disabilities

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

31

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

14

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Limited English Proficient

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

2

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

1

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Economically Disadvantaged

MADE AYP: NO

Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

231*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

54%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

62

PI

105

EAMO

88

Safe Harbor Target

88

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP

Not American Indian or Alaska Native

Not Black or African American

Not Hispanic or Latino

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Not White

Not Multiracial

General Education

English Proficient

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Male

Female

Migrant

Not Migrant

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

381*

375*

363*

375*

22

367*

317*

377*

150*

181*

200*

0

381*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

60%*

60%*

61%*

60%*

―

59%*

62%*

60%*

69%*

64%*

57%*

―

60%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

115

113

112

113

13

109

101

114

53

56

59

0

115

PI

107

109

109

109

―

106

121

108

109

114

100

―

107

Not American Indian or Alaska Native

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

381*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

60%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

115

PI

107

Not Black or African American

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

375*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

60%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

113

PI

109

Not Hispanic or Latino

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

363*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

61%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

112

PI

109

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

375*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

60%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

113

PI

109

Not White

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

22

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

13

PI

―

Not Multiracial

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

367*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

59%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

109

PI

106

General Education

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

317*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

62%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

101

PI

121

English Proficient

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

377*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

60%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

114

PI

108

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

150*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

69%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

53

PI

109

Male

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

181*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

64%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

56

PI

114

Female

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

200*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

57%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

59

PI

100

Migrant

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

―

Not Migrant

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

381*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

60%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

115

PI

107

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.

Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: YES

GROUP

All Students

American Indian or Alaska Native

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

White

Multiracial

Students With Disabilities

Limited English Proficient

Economically Disadvantaged

MADE AYP

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

YES

Tested 80%

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

64

0

1

3

1

56

3

9

1

37

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

94%

―

―

―

―

95%

―

―

―

―

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

60

0

1

2

1

53

3

7

0

33

PI

180

―

―

―

―

185

―

―

―

167

EAMO

177

―

―

―

―

182

―

―

―

166

Progress Target

167

―

―

―

―

161

―

―

―

151

All Students

MADE AYP: YES

Tested 80%

YES

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

64

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

94%

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

60

PI

180

EAMO

177

Progress Target

167

American Indian or Alaska Native

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 80%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

―

EAMO

―

Progress Target

―

Black or African American

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 80%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

1

PI

―

EAMO

―

Progress Target

―

Hispanic or Latino

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 80%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

3

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

2

PI

―

EAMO

―

Progress Target

―

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 80%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

1

PI

―

EAMO

―

Progress Target

―

White

MADE AYP: YES

Tested 80%

YES

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

56

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

95%

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

53

PI

185

EAMO

182

Progress Target

161

Multiracial

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 80%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

3

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

3

PI

―

EAMO

―

Progress Target

―

Students With Disabilities

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 80%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

9

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

7

PI

―

EAMO

―

Progress Target

―

Limited English Proficient

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 80%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

―

EAMO

―

Progress Target

―

Economically Disadvantaged

MADE AYP: YES

Tested 80%

―

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

37

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

33

PI

167

EAMO

166

Progress Target

151

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP

Not American Indian or Alaska Native

Not Black or African American

Not Hispanic or Latino

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Not White

Not Multiracial

General Education

English Proficient

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Male

Female

Migrant

Not Migrant

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

64

63

61

63

8

61

55

63

27

35

29

0

64

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

94%

94%

95%

94%

―

93%

96%

95%

―

―

―

―

94%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

60

59

58

59

7

57

53

60

27

31

29

0

60

PI

180

181

183

181

―

179

189

180

―

181

―

―

180

Not American Indian or Alaska Native

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

64

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

94%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

60

PI

180

Not Black or African American

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

63

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

94%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

59

PI

181

Not Hispanic or Latino

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

61

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

95%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

58

PI

183

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

63

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

94%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

59

PI

181

Not White

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

8

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

7

PI

―

Not Multiracial

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

61

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

93%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

57

PI

179

General Education

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

55

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

96%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

53

PI

189

English Proficient

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

63

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

95%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

60

PI

180

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

27

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

27

PI

―

Male

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

35

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

31

PI

181

Female

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

29

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

29

PI

―

Migrant

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

―

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

―

Not Migrant

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

64

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

94%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

60

PI

180

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.

Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs

GROUP

All Students

American Indian or Alaska Native

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

White

Multiracial

Students With Disabilities

Limited English Proficient

Economically Disadvantaged

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

119

―

―

―

―

124

―

―

―

109

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

107

―

―

―

―

112

―

―

―

105

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

―

―

―

―

―

―

―

―

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

―

―

―

―

―

―

―

―

―

UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI

113

0

0

0

0

118

0

0

0

107

All Students

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

119

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

107

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

Unweighted Combined PI

113

American Indian or Alaska Native

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

―

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

―

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

Unweighted Combined PI

0

Black or African American

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

―

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

―

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

Unweighted Combined PI

0

Hispanic or Latino

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

―

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

―

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

Unweighted Combined PI

0

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

―

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

―

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

Unweighted Combined PI

0

White

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

124

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

112

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

Unweighted Combined PI

118

Multiracial

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

―

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

―

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

Unweighted Combined PI

0

Students With Disabilities

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

―

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

―

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

Unweighted Combined PI

0

Limited English Proficient

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

―

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

―

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

Unweighted Combined PI

0

Economically Disadvantaged

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

109

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

105

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

Unweighted Combined PI

107

― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.

General Information

NYSED Homepage

EngageNY

FOIL

Twitter

Offices at NYSED

Information and Reporting Services

Special Education

Higher Education

Teacher and Principal Evaluation

Additional Information

Data Disclaimer

Login

Help

Subscribe to be notified when new data is added to this site:

What's your email address?
Don't fill field in:

© Copyright New York State Education Department, all rights reserved.

This document was created on: April 27, 2018, 11:18 am EST

Top

You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.

Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.